Inflammatory Biomarker Panels and Sepsis Prognosis in Intensive Care Cohorts
Keywords:
Sepsis, Biomarkers, Intensive Care, Prognosis, InflammationAbstract
Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality and critical illness worldwide, characterized by a dysregulated host response to infection that precipitates life-threatening organ dysfunction. Traditional approaches to diagnosing and prognosticating sepsis have relied heavily on clinical scoring systems and single biological markers, which often fail to capture the complex, highly heterogeneous pathophysiological processes underlying the condition. This prospective cohort study investigates the prognostic utility of a multidimensional inflammatory biomarker panel in intensive care unit patients diagnosed with sepsis. Over a continuous twenty-four-month period, adult patients meeting the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock were enrolled across multiple academic medical centers. A comprehensive panel comprising interleukin-6, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, and procalcitonin was measured at baseline, day three, and day seven following intensive care admission. The primary outcome was twenty-eight-day all-cause mortality. Utilizing advanced multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and machine learning-derived composite scoring, the integrated biomarker panel demonstrated significant superiority over standard clinical assessments and single-marker approaches in predicting both short-term mortality and the trajectory of multi-organ failure. The findings suggest that dynamic profiling of host immune responses via composite biomarker panels can substantially enhance risk stratification, thereby facilitating more precise and timely therapeutic interventions in critically ill cohorts.References
1. Costa, E.L.; Borges, J.B.; Melo, A.; Suarez-Sipmann, F.; Toufen, C., Jr.; Bohm, S.H.; Amato, M.B. Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension by electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 35, 1132–1137.
2. Basher, A.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Islam, M.M.; Rashid, M.M.; Chowdhury, I.H.; Akm, A.; Rabbani, K.S. Evaluation of gastric emptying in critically ill patients using electrical impedance method: A pilot study. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2022, 46, 363–369.
3. Anderson, J.M.; Jiang, S. Implications of the Acute and Chronic Inflammatory Response and the Foreign Body Reaction to the Immune Response of Implanted Biomaterials. In The Immune Response to Implanted Materials and Devices: The Impact of the Immune System on the Success of an Implant; Corradetti, B., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 15–36.
4. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower, R.G.; Matthay, M.A.; Morris, A.; Schoenfeld, D.; Thompson, B.T.; Wheeler, A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 342, 1301–1308.
5. Yoshida, T.; Torsani, V.; Gomes, S.; De Santis, R.R.; Beraldo, M.A.; Costa, E.L.; Tucci, M.R.; Zin, W.A.; Kavanagh, B.P.; Amato, M.B. Spontaneous effort causes occult pendelluft during mechanical ventilation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 188, 1420–1427.
6. Prins, S.A.; Weller, D.; Labout, J.A.M.; den Uil, C.A. Electrical Impedance Tomography As a Bedside Diagnostic Tool for Pulmonary Embolism. Crit. Care Explor. 2023, 5, e0843. [ Central]
7. ISO 10993; Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
8. Radke, C.; Horn, D.; Lanckohr, C.; Ellger, B.; Meyer, M.; Eissing, T.; Hempel, G. Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling Approach to Predict the Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Septic Patients. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2017, 56, 759–779.
9. Songsangvorn, N.; Xu, Y.; Lu, C.; Rotstein, O.; Brochard, L.; Slutsky, A.S.; Burns, K.E.A.; Zhang, H. Electrical impedance tomography-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in ARDS: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2024, 50, 617–631. [ Central]
10. Mi, L.; Chi, Y.; Yuan, S.; He, H.; Long, Y.; Frerichs, I.; Zhao, Z. Effect of Prone Positioning With Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Electrical Impedance Tomography. Front. Physiol. 2022, 3, 906302. [ Central]
11. Spinelli, E.; Kircher, M.; Stender, B.; Ottaviani, I.; Basile, M.C.; Marongiu, I.; Colussi, G.; Grasselli, G.; Pesenti, A.; Mauri, T. Unmatched ventilation and perfusion measured by electrical impedance tomography predicts the outcome of ARDS. Crit. Care 2021, 25, 192. [ Central]
12. Moonen, P.J.; Reintam Blaser, A.; Starkopf, J.; Oudemans-van Straaten, H.M.; Van der Mullen, J.; Vermeulen, G.; Malbrain, M.L.N.G. The black box revelation: Monitoring gastrointestinal function. Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. 2018, 50, 72–81.
13. Bengtson, B.P.; Van Natta, B.W.; Murphy, D.K.; Slicton, A.; Maxwell, G.P.; Style 410 U.S. Core Clinical Study Group. Style 410 Highly Cohesive Silicone Breast Implant Core Study Results at 3 Years. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2007, 120, 40S–48S.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.